Triple Threat WNBA Mobile Snapshot

2026-08-22 · Captured 2026-08-22 22:11 UTC
Frozen pregame snapshot. 3 games loaded Lines and projections do not update on this page.
Indiana Fever 24-13
New York Liberty 22-15
Scheduled · Barclays Center
ML+134 / -157
Spread-3.5 (-112 / -105)
Total186.5 (O -118 / U -103)
pinnacle
Indiana Fever
Off Rating115.0 ▼ Def Rating107.8 ▼ Net Rating7.2 ▼ Pace99.3
New York Liberty
Off Rating111.3 ▼ Def Rating107.6 Net Rating3.8 ▼ Pace96.6 ▲
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v6-volatility-rotation
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Indiana Fever84.9
–
New York Liberty88.1
Indiana Fever37.4%New York Liberty62.6%
Possessions81.6 Model spreadNew York Liberty -3.2 Model total173 Game-script reliability64.5%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread-3.5+0.3 Total186.5-13.5 Moneyline61.1%+1.5%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerNew York Liberty 62.6%
SpreadPass
TotalUnder 186.5 · Bet
Best playTotal: Under 186.5
Early thresholds · a pass is intentional.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 64.5/100
New York LibertyLine ML · -157
Model57.4%
Edge (no-vig)-1.4 pp
Fair-135
Projection 1.69 · Break-even 61.1% · No-vig 58.8%
Indiana FeverLine ML · +134
Model42.6%
Edge (no-vig)+1.4 pp
Fair+135
Projection -1.69 · Break-even 42.7% · No-vig 41.2%
SPREADReliability 64.5/100
New York LibertyLine -3.5 · -105
Model42.1%
Edge (no-vig)-7.2 pp
Fair+138
Projection 1.69 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 49.2%
Indiana FeverLine 3.5 · -112
Model57.9%
Edge (no-vig)+7.2 pp
Fair-138
Projection -1.69 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 50.8%
TOTALReliability 64.5/100
OverLine 186.5 · -118
Model12.9%
Edge (no-vig)-38.7 pp
Fair+676
Projection 171.91 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 51.6%
UnderLine 186.5 · -103
Model87.1%
Edge (no-vig)+38.7 pp
Fair-676
Projection 171.91 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 48.4%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 64.5/100
Pauline Astier OverLine 7.5 · +103
Model38.8%
Edge (no-vig)-7.2 pp
Fair+158
Projection 7.1 · Break-even 49.3% · No-vig 46.0%
Pauline Astier UnderLine 7.5 · -137
Model61.2%
Edge (no-vig)+7.2 pp
Fair-158
Projection 7.1 · Break-even 57.8% · No-vig 54.0%
Sophie Cunningham OverLine 7.5 · +103
Model32.2%
Edge (no-vig)-14.4 pp
Fair+210
Projection 5.5 · Break-even 49.3% · No-vig 46.7%
Sophie Cunningham UnderLine 7.5 · -129
Model67.8%
Edge (no-vig)+14.4 pp
Fair-210
Projection 5.5 · Break-even 56.3% · No-vig 53.3%
Rebecca Allen OverLine 7.5 · -109
Model65.5%
Edge (no-vig)+16.8 pp
Fair-190
Projection 10 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 48.7%
Rebecca Allen UnderLine 7.5 · -122
Model34.5%
Edge (no-vig)-16.8 pp
Fair+190
Projection 10 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.3%
Makayla Timpson OverLine 8.5 · -107
Model48.2%
Edge (no-vig)-0.1 pp
Fair+107
Projection 9 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.3%
Makayla Timpson UnderLine 8.5 · -124
Model51.8%
Edge (no-vig)+0.1 pp
Fair-107
Projection 9 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 51.7%
Jonquel Jones OverLine 14.5 · -125
Model13.2%
Edge (no-vig)-38.7 pp
Fair+656
Projection 7.1 · Break-even 55.6% · No-vig 51.9%
Jonquel Jones UnderLine 14.5 · -106
Model86.8%
Edge (no-vig)+38.7 pp
Fair-656
Projection 7.1 · Break-even 51.5% · No-vig 48.1%
Aliyah Boston OverLine 15.5 · -123
Model4.5%
Edge (no-vig)-47.0 pp
Fair+2103
Projection 8.4 · Break-even 55.2% · No-vig 51.5%
Aliyah Boston UnderLine 15.5 · -108
Model95.5%
Edge (no-vig)+47.0 pp
Fair-2103
Projection 8.4 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.5%
Sabrina Ionescu OverLine 17.5 · -126
Model54.9%
Edge (no-vig)+2.7 pp
Fair-122
Projection 17 · Break-even 55.8% · No-vig 52.1%
Sabrina Ionescu UnderLine 17.5 · -105
Model45.1%
Edge (no-vig)-2.7 pp
Fair+122
Projection 17 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 47.9%
Breanna Stewart OverLine 22.5 · -114
Model24.1%
Edge (no-vig)-25.6 pp
Fair+314
Projection 17.2 · Break-even 53.3% · No-vig 49.7%
Breanna Stewart UnderLine 22.5 · -117
Model75.9%
Edge (no-vig)+25.6 pp
Fair-314
Projection 17.2 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.3%
Caitlin Clark OverLine 23.5 · -117
Model20.7%
Edge (no-vig)-29.7 pp
Fair+383
Projection 18.8 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.4%
Caitlin Clark UnderLine 23.5 · -113
Model79.3%
Edge (no-vig)+29.7 pp
Fair-383
Projection 18.8 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.6%
Kelsey Mitchell OverLine 24.5 · -127
Model70.6%
Edge (no-vig)+18.4 pp
Fair-240
Projection 27.8 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.2%
Kelsey Mitchell UnderLine 24.5 · -105
Model29.4%
Edge (no-vig)-18.4 pp
Fair+240
Projection 27.8 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 47.8%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 64.5/100
Rebecca Allen OverLine 2.5 · -134
Model62.7%
Edge (no-vig)+9.6 pp
Fair-168
Projection 3.9 · Break-even 57.3% · No-vig 53.1%
Rebecca Allen UnderLine 2.5 · -102
Model37.3%
Edge (no-vig)-9.6 pp
Fair+168
Projection 3.9 · Break-even 50.5% · No-vig 46.9%
Caitlin Clark OverLine 4.5 · +112
Model12.6%
Edge (no-vig)-31.2 pp
Fair+695
Projection 2.9 · Break-even 47.2% · No-vig 43.8%
Caitlin Clark UnderLine 4.5 · -153
Model87.4%
Edge (no-vig)+31.2 pp
Fair-695
Projection 2.9 · Break-even 60.5% · No-vig 56.2%
Sabrina Ionescu OverLine 4.5 · +103
Model46.6%
Edge (no-vig)+0.8 pp
Fair+115
Projection 4.4 · Break-even 49.3% · No-vig 45.8%
Sabrina Ionescu UnderLine 4.5 · -140
Model53.4%
Edge (no-vig)-0.8 pp
Fair-115
Projection 4.4 · Break-even 58.3% · No-vig 54.2%
Makayla Timpson OverLine 7.5 · +107
Model54.8%
Edge (no-vig)+9.8 pp
Fair-121
Projection 7.6 · Break-even 48.3% · No-vig 44.9%
Makayla Timpson UnderLine 7.5 · -145
Model45.2%
Edge (no-vig)-9.8 pp
Fair+121
Projection 7.6 · Break-even 59.2% · No-vig 55.1%
Breanna Stewart OverLine 8.5 · +101
Model20.2%
Edge (no-vig)-26.0 pp
Fair+394
Projection 6.6 · Break-even 49.8% · No-vig 46.3%
Breanna Stewart UnderLine 8.5 · -137
Model79.8%
Edge (no-vig)+26.0 pp
Fair-394
Projection 6.6 · Break-even 57.8% · No-vig 53.7%
Jonquel Jones OverLine 8.5 · -140
Model26.8%
Edge (no-vig)-27.4 pp
Fair+273
Projection 4.8 · Break-even 58.3% · No-vig 54.2%
Jonquel Jones UnderLine 8.5 · +103
Model73.2%
Edge (no-vig)+27.4 pp
Fair-273
Projection 4.8 · Break-even 49.3% · No-vig 45.8%
Aliyah Boston OverLine 9.5 · +107
Model11.2%
Edge (no-vig)-33.7 pp
Fair+792
Projection 5.2 · Break-even 48.3% · No-vig 44.9%
Aliyah Boston UnderLine 9.5 · -146
Model88.8%
Edge (no-vig)+33.7 pp
Fair-792
Projection 5.2 · Break-even 59.4% · No-vig 55.1%
Connecticut Sun 9-26
Los Angeles Sparks 12-24
Scheduled · crypto.com Arena
ML+170 / -201
Spread-5 (-105 / -111)
Total171 (O -108 / U -112)
pinnacle
Connecticut Sun
Off Rating98.8 ▲ Def Rating108.2 ▼ Net Rating-9.5 ▲ Pace96.0
Los Angeles Sparks
Off Rating106.5 ▼ Def Rating112.1 ▼ Net Rating-5.6 ▼ Pace98.9
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v6-volatility-rotation
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Connecticut Sun83.2
–
Los Angeles Sparks90.7
Connecticut Sun28.0%Los Angeles Sparks72.0%
Possessions81.2 Model spreadLos Angeles Sparks -7.5 Model total173.9 Game-script reliability73.8%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread-5.0-2.5 Total171+2.9 Moneyline66.8%+5.2%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerLos Angeles Sparks 72.0%
SpreadLos Angeles Sparks · Bet
TotalOver 171 · Lean
Best playMoneyline: Los Angeles Sparks
Early thresholds · a pass is intentional.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 73.8/100
Los Angeles SparksLine ML · -201
Model69.5%
Edge (no-vig)+5.2 pp
Fair-228
Projection 5.99 · Break-even 66.8% · No-vig 64.3%
Connecticut SunLine ML · +170
Model30.5%
Edge (no-vig)-5.2 pp
Fair+228
Projection -5.99 · Break-even 37.0% · No-vig 35.7%
SPREADReliability 73.8/100
Los Angeles SparksLine -5 · -111
Model53.4%
Edge (no-vig)+2.7 pp
Fair-114
Projection 5.99 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 50.7%
Connecticut SunLine 5 · -105
Model46.6%
Edge (no-vig)-2.7 pp
Fair+114
Projection -5.99 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 49.3%
TOTALReliability 73.8/100
OverLine 171 · -108
Model54.3%
Edge (no-vig)+4.8 pp
Fair-119
Projection 172.81 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 49.6%
UnderLine 171 · -112
Model45.7%
Edge (no-vig)-4.8 pp
Fair+119
Projection 172.81 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 50.4%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 73.8/100
Saniya Rivers OverLine 8.5 · +105
Model32.4%
Edge (no-vig)-13.1 pp
Fair+208
Projection 6.5 · Break-even 48.8% · No-vig 45.5%
Saniya Rivers UnderLine 8.5 · -140
Model67.6%
Edge (no-vig)+13.1 pp
Fair-208
Projection 6.5 · Break-even 58.3% · No-vig 54.5%
Ariel Atkins OverLine 8.5 · +108
Model21.8%
Edge (no-vig)-24.8 pp
Fair+359
Projection 6.1 · Break-even 48.1% · No-vig 46.6%
Ariel Atkins UnderLine 8.5 · -123
Model78.2%
Edge (no-vig)+24.8 pp
Fair-359
Projection 6.1 · Break-even 55.2% · No-vig 53.4%
Erica Wheeler OverLine 8.5 · -113
Model58.9%
Edge (no-vig)+9.3 pp
Fair-143
Projection 9.9 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.6%
Erica Wheeler UnderLine 8.5 · -117
Model41.1%
Edge (no-vig)-9.3 pp
Fair+143
Projection 9.9 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.4%
Cameron Brink OverLine 8.5 · -116
Model26.6%
Edge (no-vig)-23.5 pp
Fair+275
Projection 6.2 · Break-even 53.7% · No-vig 50.1%
Cameron Brink UnderLine 8.5 · -115
Model73.4%
Edge (no-vig)+23.5 pp
Fair-275
Projection 6.2 · Break-even 53.5% · No-vig 49.9%
Charlisse Leger-Walker OverLine 8.5 · -120
Model58.1%
Edge (no-vig)+7.1 pp
Fair-139
Projection 9.1 · Break-even 54.5% · No-vig 51.0%
Charlisse Leger-Walker UnderLine 8.5 · -110
Model41.9%
Edge (no-vig)-7.1 pp
Fair+139
Projection 9.1 · Break-even 52.4% · No-vig 49.0%
Kennedy Burke OverLine 9.5 · -104
Model74.0%
Edge (no-vig)+26.4 pp
Fair-284
Projection 13.3 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.6%
Kennedy Burke UnderLine 9.5 · -128
Model26.0%
Edge (no-vig)-26.4 pp
Fair+284
Projection 13.3 · Break-even 56.1% · No-vig 52.4%
Diamond Miller OverLine 12.5 · -103
Model43.9%
Edge (no-vig)-3.6 pp
Fair+128
Projection 10.5 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 47.5%
Diamond Miller UnderLine 12.5 · -128
Model56.1%
Edge (no-vig)+3.6 pp
Fair-128
Projection 10.5 · Break-even 56.1% · No-vig 52.5%
Leila Lacan OverLine 12.5 · -110
Model16.0%
Edge (no-vig)-32.9 pp
Fair+523
Projection 9.8 · Break-even 52.4% · No-vig 48.9%
Leila Lacan UnderLine 12.5 · -121
Model84.0%
Edge (no-vig)+32.9 pp
Fair-523
Projection 9.8 · Break-even 54.8% · No-vig 51.1%
Olivia Nelson-Ododa OverLine 13.5 · -124
Model51.0%
Edge (no-vig)-0.7 pp
Fair-104
Projection 13.8 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 51.7%
Olivia Nelson-Ododa UnderLine 13.5 · -107
Model49.0%
Edge (no-vig)+0.7 pp
Fair+104
Projection 13.8 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.3%
Dearica Hamby OverLine 14.5 · -101
Model65.7%
Edge (no-vig)+18.7 pp
Fair-191
Projection 16.7 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 47.0%
Dearica Hamby UnderLine 14.5 · -131
Model34.3%
Edge (no-vig)-18.7 pp
Fair+191
Projection 16.7 · Break-even 56.7% · No-vig 53.0%
Nneka Ogwumike OverLine 15.5 · -104
Model58.4%
Edge (no-vig)+10.8 pp
Fair-140
Projection 16 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.6%
Nneka Ogwumike UnderLine 15.5 · -128
Model41.6%
Edge (no-vig)-10.8 pp
Fair+140
Projection 16 · Break-even 56.1% · No-vig 52.4%
Rae Burrell OverLine 16.5 · -104
Model60.3%
Edge (no-vig)+12.7 pp
Fair-152
Projection 18.6 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.7%
Rae Burrell UnderLine 16.5 · -127
Model39.7%
Edge (no-vig)-12.7 pp
Fair+152
Projection 18.6 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.3%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 73.8/100
Leila Lacan OverLine 2.5 · +116
Model30.1%
Edge (no-vig)-13.0 pp
Fair+232
Projection 1.5 · Break-even 46.3% · No-vig 43.1%
Leila Lacan UnderLine 2.5 · -157
Model69.8%
Edge (no-vig)+13.0 pp
Fair-232
Projection 1.5 · Break-even 61.1% · No-vig 56.9%
Ariel Atkins OverLine 2.5 · -108
Model41.9%
Edge (no-vig)-6.4 pp
Fair+139
Projection 2.1 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.3%
Ariel Atkins UnderLine 2.5 · -125
Model58.1%
Edge (no-vig)+6.4 pp
Fair-139
Projection 2.1 · Break-even 55.6% · No-vig 51.7%
Rae Burrell OverLine 2.5 · -122
Model46.6%
Edge (no-vig)-4.4 pp
Fair+115
Projection 2.4 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.0%
Rae Burrell UnderLine 2.5 · -112
Model53.4%
Edge (no-vig)+4.4 pp
Fair-115
Projection 2.4 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.0%
Cameron Brink OverLine 4.5 · -129
Model29.6%
Edge (no-vig)-22.7 pp
Fair+238
Projection 3.9 · Break-even 56.3% · No-vig 52.3%
Cameron Brink UnderLine 4.5 · -106
Model70.4%
Edge (no-vig)+22.7 pp
Fair-238
Projection 3.9 · Break-even 51.5% · No-vig 47.7%
Dearica Hamby OverLine 6.5 · -122
Model48.9%
Edge (no-vig)-2.2 pp
Fair+105
Projection 6.6 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.1%
Dearica Hamby UnderLine 6.5 · -111
Model51.1%
Edge (no-vig)+2.2 pp
Fair-105
Projection 6.6 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 48.9%
Nneka Ogwumike OverLine 7.5 · +101
Model51.5%
Edge (no-vig)+5.0 pp
Fair-106
Projection 8 · Break-even 49.8% · No-vig 46.6%
Nneka Ogwumike UnderLine 7.5 · -133
Model48.5%
Edge (no-vig)-5.0 pp
Fair+106
Projection 8 · Break-even 57.1% · No-vig 53.4%
Olivia Nelson-Ododa OverLine 8.5 · -111
Model40.4%
Edge (no-vig)-8.5 pp
Fair+148
Projection 6.7 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 48.9%
Olivia Nelson-Ododa UnderLine 8.5 · -122
Model59.6%
Edge (no-vig)+8.5 pp
Fair-148
Projection 6.7 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.1%
Atlanta Dream 23-13
Phoenix Mercury 13-23
Scheduled · Mortgage Matchup Center
ML-309 / +253
Spread7.5 (-111 / -105)
Total177.5 (O -109 / U -111)
pinnacle
Atlanta Dream
Off Rating110.5 ▼ Def Rating104.8 ▼ Net Rating5.7 Pace97.7 ▲
Phoenix Mercury
Off Rating104.5 ▲ Def Rating108.9 Net Rating-4.4 Pace96.0
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v6-volatility-rotation
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Atlanta Dream86.3
–
Phoenix Mercury79
Atlanta Dream72.0%Phoenix Mercury28.0%
Possessions80.7 Model spreadPhoenix Mercury +7.3 Model total165.3 Game-script reliability70.9%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread+7.5-0.2 Total177.5-12.2 Moneyline28.3%-0.4%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerAtlanta Dream 72.0%
SpreadPass
TotalUnder 177.5 · Bet
Best playTotal: Under 177.5
Early thresholds · a pass is intentional.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 70.9/100
Phoenix MercuryLine ML · +253
Model21.9%
Edge (no-vig)-5.3 pp
Fair+356
Projection -8.81 · Break-even 28.3% · No-vig 27.3%
Atlanta DreamLine ML · -309
Model78.0%
Edge (no-vig)+5.3 pp
Fair-356
Projection 8.81 · Break-even 75.5% · No-vig 72.7%
SPREADReliability 70.9/100
Phoenix MercuryLine 7.5 · -105
Model45.4%
Edge (no-vig)-3.9 pp
Fair+120
Projection -8.81 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 49.3%
Atlanta DreamLine -7.5 · -111
Model54.6%
Edge (no-vig)+3.9 pp
Fair-120
Projection 8.81 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 50.7%
TOTALReliability 70.9/100
OverLine 177.5 · -109
Model20.6%
Edge (no-vig)-29.2 pp
Fair+385
Projection 164.21 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 49.8%
UnderLine 177.5 · -111
Model79.4%
Edge (no-vig)+29.2 pp
Fair-385
Projection 164.21 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 50.2%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 70.9/100
Naz Hillmon OverLine 8.5 · -124
Model41.2%
Edge (no-vig)-10.5 pp
Fair+142
Projection 7.9 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 51.7%
Naz Hillmon UnderLine 8.5 · -107
Model58.8%
Edge (no-vig)+10.5 pp
Fair-142
Projection 7.9 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.3%
Jordin Canada OverLine 10.5 · -128
Model52.3%
Edge (no-vig)-0.1 pp
Fair-110
Projection 11.5 · Break-even 56.1% · No-vig 52.4%
Jordin Canada UnderLine 10.5 · -104
Model47.7%
Edge (no-vig)+0.1 pp
Fair+110
Projection 11.5 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.6%
DeWanna Bonner OverLine 10.5 · -129
Model55.8%
Edge (no-vig)+3.1 pp
Fair-126
Projection 12.9 · Break-even 56.3% · No-vig 52.6%
DeWanna Bonner UnderLine 10.5 · -103
Model44.2%
Edge (no-vig)-3.1 pp
Fair+126
Projection 12.9 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 47.4%
Kelsey PlumInsufficient data
Alyssa Thomas OverLine 14.5 · -102
Model53.4%
Edge (no-vig)+6.2 pp
Fair-114
Projection 14 · Break-even 50.5% · No-vig 47.2%
Alyssa Thomas UnderLine 14.5 · -130
Model46.6%
Edge (no-vig)-6.2 pp
Fair+114
Projection 14 · Break-even 56.5% · No-vig 52.8%
Angel Reese OverLine 16.5 · -117
Model42.2%
Edge (no-vig)-8.1 pp
Fair+137
Projection 14.5 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.3%
Angel Reese UnderLine 16.5 · -114
Model57.8%
Edge (no-vig)+8.1 pp
Fair-137
Projection 14.5 · Break-even 53.3% · No-vig 49.7%
Rhyne Howard OverLine 19.5 · -118
Model57.6%
Edge (no-vig)+7.0 pp
Fair-136
Projection 20.1 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.6%
Rhyne Howard UnderLine 19.5 · -112
Model42.4%
Edge (no-vig)-7.0 pp
Fair+136
Projection 20.1 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.4%
Allisha Gray OverLine 19.5 · -122
Model42.6%
Edge (no-vig)-8.8 pp
Fair+135
Projection 18.3 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.4%
Allisha Gray UnderLine 19.5 · -108
Model57.4%
Edge (no-vig)+8.8 pp
Fair-135
Projection 18.3 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.6%
Kahleah Copper OverLine 20.5 · -108
Model33.9%
Edge (no-vig)-14.7 pp
Fair+195
Projection 18 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.6%
Kahleah Copper UnderLine 20.5 · -122
Model66.1%
Edge (no-vig)+14.7 pp
Fair-195
Projection 18 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.4%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 70.9/100
Kahleah Copper OverLine 3.5 · +121
Model42.5%
Edge (no-vig)+0.4 pp
Fair+135
Projection 3 · Break-even 45.3% · No-vig 42.1%
Kahleah Copper UnderLine 3.5 · -165
Model57.5%
Edge (no-vig)-0.4 pp
Fair-135
Projection 3 · Break-even 62.3% · No-vig 57.9%
Allisha Gray OverLine 3.5 · +118
Model49.1%
Edge (no-vig)+6.5 pp
Fair+104
Projection 3.8 · Break-even 45.9% · No-vig 42.6%
Allisha Gray UnderLine 3.5 · -161
Model50.9%
Edge (no-vig)-6.5 pp
Fair-104
Projection 3.8 · Break-even 61.7% · No-vig 57.4%
Jordin Canada OverLine 3.5 · -108
Model62.7%
Edge (no-vig)+14.4 pp
Fair-168
Projection 4.3 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.3%
Jordin Canada UnderLine 3.5 · -125
Model37.3%
Edge (no-vig)-14.4 pp
Fair+168
Projection 4.3 · Break-even 55.6% · No-vig 51.7%
Rhyne Howard OverLine 3.5 · -115
Model47.6%
Edge (no-vig)-2.1 pp
Fair+110
Projection 3.3 · Break-even 53.5% · No-vig 49.7%
Rhyne Howard UnderLine 3.5 · -118
Model52.4%
Edge (no-vig)+2.1 pp
Fair-110
Projection 3.3 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.3%
Naz Hillmon OverLine 4.5 · -136
Model60.7%
Edge (no-vig)+7.1 pp
Fair-154
Projection 5 · Break-even 57.6% · No-vig 53.5%
Naz Hillmon UnderLine 4.5 · +100
Model39.3%
Edge (no-vig)-7.1 pp
Fair+154
Projection 5 · Break-even 50.0% · No-vig 46.5%
DeWanna Bonner OverLine 6.5 · -115
Model60.5%
Edge (no-vig)+10.8 pp
Fair-153
Projection 7.1 · Break-even 53.5% · No-vig 49.7%
DeWanna Bonner UnderLine 6.5 · -118
Model39.5%
Edge (no-vig)-10.8 pp
Fair+153
Projection 7.1 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.3%
Alyssa Thomas OverLine 8.5 · -117
Model49.2%
Edge (no-vig)-0.9 pp
Fair+103
Projection 8.7 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.1%
Alyssa Thomas UnderLine 8.5 · -116
Model50.8%
Edge (no-vig)+0.9 pp
Fair-103
Projection 8.7 · Break-even 53.7% · No-vig 49.9%
Angel Reese OverLine 12.5 · -135
Model61.0%
Edge (no-vig)+7.7 pp
Fair-156
Projection 13.3 · Break-even 57.5% · No-vig 53.3%
Angel Reese UnderLine 12.5 · -101
Model39.0%
Edge (no-vig)-7.7 pp
Fair+156
Projection 13.3 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.7%

Player PTS & REB Projections

Pregame outputs from projected rotations and stored ESPN box-score history.

player-pr-v1

Indiana Fever at New York Liberty

Indiana Fever15 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Kelsey MitchellACTIVE34.327.82.1
Caitlin ClarkPROBABLE31.718.82.9
Makayla TimpsonACTIVE31.29.07.6
Sophie CunninghamACTIVE24.35.52.3
Lexie HullACTIVE16.63.73.0
Aliyah BostonQUESTIONABLE16.38.45.2
Monique BillingsACTIVE15.95.53.1
Tyasha HarrisACTIVE14.13.41.1
Myisha Hines-AllenACTIVE8.51.31.9
Raven JohnsonACTIVE4.00.50.1
Mercedes RussellACTIVE2.11.00.0
Grace VanSlootenACTIVE1.00.00.0
Bree HallACTIVE0.00.00.0
Michelle OnyiahACTIVE0.00.00.0
Damiris DantasOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line
New York Liberty13 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Breanna StewartACTIVE30.617.26.6
Sabrina IonescuACTIVE29.717.04.4
Rebecca AllenACTIVE26.110.03.9
Marine JohannesACTIVE21.811.11.2
Pauline AstierACTIVE19.87.11.7
Han XuACTIVE18.09.04.5
Rebekah GardnerACTIVE14.65.43.5
Marine FauthouxACTIVE13.53.22.0
Jonquel JonesQUESTIONABLE12.67.14.8
Raquel CarreraACTIVE7.31.01.8
Anneli MaleyACTIVE6.00.01.5
Leonie FiebichQUESTIONABLE0.00.00.0
Satou SaballyOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line

Connecticut Sun at Los Angeles Sparks

Connecticut Sun14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Leila LacanACTIVE26.69.81.5
Charlisse Leger-WalkerACTIVE25.89.13.0
Olivia Nelson-OdodaACTIVE23.013.86.7
Kennedy BurkeACTIVE22.213.33.0
Diamond MillerACTIVE21.610.53.1
Saniya RiversACTIVE20.36.53.2
Hailey Van LithACTIVE13.44.51.5
Nell AnglomaACTIVE12.83.72.0
Raegan BeersACTIVE11.94.13.1
Ashlon JacksonACTIVE9.62.10.0
Gianna KneepkensACTIVE7.33.51.0
Rayah MarshallACTIVE5.52.31.6
Aaliyah EdwardsOUT0.00.00.0
Brittney GrinerOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line
Los Angeles Sparks14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Rae BurrellACTIVE31.118.62.4
Nneka OgwumikeACTIVE29.816.08.0
Dearica HambyACTIVE29.316.76.6
Erica WheelerACTIVE25.49.92.2
Ariel AtkinsPROBABLE22.66.12.1
Cameron BrinkACTIVE12.26.23.9
Monique Akoa MakaniACTIVE9.42.70.6
Tonie MorganACTIVE8.64.00.3
Chance GrayACTIVE6.82.20.7
Alissa PiliACTIVE6.01.91.5
Jihyun ParkACTIVE5.61.80.5
Kiana WilliamsACTIVE5.12.00.6
Kate MartinACTIVE4.60.91.5
Emma CannonACTIVE3.51.70.9
Add optional player line

Atlanta Dream at Phoenix Mercury

Atlanta Dream14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Rhyne HowardACTIVE34.120.13.3
Angel ReeseACTIVE32.614.513.3
Allisha GrayACTIVE31.918.33.8
Jordin CanadaACTIVE31.011.54.3
Naz HillmonACTIVE28.37.95.0
Isobel BorlaseACTIVE12.63.01.5
Madina OkotACTIVE8.83.62.9
Te-Hina PaopaoACTIVE6.52.50.3
Jaylyn SherrodACTIVE5.91.40.8
Aaliyah NyeACTIVE3.31.30.4
Sika KoneACTIVE2.30.70.4
Indya NivarACTIVE0.00.00.0
Brionna JonesOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line
Phoenix Mercury15 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Alyssa ThomasACTIVE34.514.08.7
Kahleah CopperACTIVE34.418.03.0
DeWanna BonnerACTIVE29.012.97.1
Noemie BrochantACTIVE25.38.21.5
Sami WhitcombACTIVE16.45.31.4
Natasha MackACTIVE15.95.63.9
Valeriane AyayiACTIVE12.53.31.5
Kelsey PlumQUESTIONABLE11.18.01.2
Kyara LinskensACTIVE9.81.33.8
Lexi HeldACTIVE8.62.21.0
Marta SuarezQUESTIONABLE2.50.10.3
Kara DunnACTIVE0.00.00.0
Maddy WestbeldACTIVE0.00.00.0
Shay CiezkiACTIVE0.00.00.0
Jovana NogicOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line