Triple Threat WNBA Mobile Snapshot

2026-08-27 · Captured 2026-08-28 00:48 UTC
Frozen pregame snapshot. 2 games loaded Lines and projections do not update on this page.
Golden State Valkyries at New York Liberty
Golden State Valkyries 27-11
New York Liberty 23-15
In Progress · Barclays Center
ML+124 / -151
Spread-2.5 (-105 / -115)
Total163.5 (O -110 / U -114)
pinnacle
Golden State Valkyries
Off Rating#7108.8 ▼ Def Rating#1100.7 ▼ Net Rating#28.1 ▼ Pace#1590.9 ▼
New York Liberty
Off Rating#4111.8 ▲ Def Rating#8107.9 ▲ Net Rating#63.9 ▲ Pace#896.8 ▲
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v7-final-role-distribution
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Golden State Valkyries86.1
–
New York Liberty78.6
Scoring range (P20 / median / P80) 76.9 / 86.1 / 95.3 71.8 / 78.6 / 85.4 Total range155 / 164.7 / 174.4
Golden State Valkyries75.6%New York Liberty24.4%
Possessions78.2 Model spreadNew York Liberty +7.5 Model total164.7 Game-script reliability75.8%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread-2.5+10.0 Total163.5+1.2 Moneyline60.2%-35.7%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerGolden State Valkyries 75.6%
SpreadGolden State Valkyries +2.5 · Bet
TotalPass
Best playMoneyline: Golden State Valkyries
Early thresholds · a pass is intentional.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 75.8/100
New York LibertyLine ML · -151
Model16.7%
Edge (no-vig)-40.7 pp
Fair+498
Projection -9.44 · Break-even 60.2% · No-vig 57.4%
Golden State ValkyriesLine ML · +124
Model83.3%
Edge (no-vig)+40.7 pp
Fair-498
Projection 9.44 · Break-even 44.6% · No-vig 42.6%
SPREADReliability 75.8/100
New York LibertyLine -2.5 · -115
Model11.1%
Edge (no-vig)-40.0 pp
Fair+801
Projection -9.44 · Break-even 53.5% · No-vig 51.1%
Golden State ValkyriesLine 2.5 · -105
Model88.9%
Edge (no-vig)+40.0 pp
Fair-801
Projection 9.44 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 48.9%
TOTALReliability 75.8/100
OverLine 163.5 · -110
Model55.0%
Edge (no-vig)+5.4 pp
Fair-122
Projection 165.56 · Break-even 52.4% · No-vig 49.6%
UnderLine 163.5 · -114
Model45.0%
Edge (no-vig)-5.4 pp
Fair+122
Projection 165.56 · Break-even 53.3% · No-vig 50.4%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 75.8/100
Marine Johannes OverLine 5.5 · -123
Model43.6%
Edge (no-vig)-8.0 pp
Fair+129
Projection 4 · Break-even 55.2% · No-vig 51.6%
Marine Johannes UnderLine 5.5 · -107
Model56.4%
Edge (no-vig)+8.0 pp
Fair-129
Projection 4 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.4%
Kayla Thornton OverLine 6.5 · -112
Model45.6%
Edge (no-vig)-3.7 pp
Fair+119
Projection 5.5 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.4%
Kayla Thornton UnderLine 6.5 · -118
Model54.4%
Edge (no-vig)+3.7 pp
Fair-119
Projection 5.5 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.6%
Pauline Astier OverLine 6.5 · -128
Model33.2%
Edge (no-vig)-19.2 pp
Fair+201
Projection 3 · Break-even 56.1% · No-vig 52.4%
Pauline Astier UnderLine 6.5 · -104
Model66.8%
Edge (no-vig)+19.2 pp
Fair-201
Projection 3 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.6%
Cecilia Zandalasini OverLine 8.5 · -117
Model43.8%
Edge (no-vig)-6.6 pp
Fair+128
Projection 7.4 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.4%
Cecilia Zandalasini UnderLine 8.5 · -113
Model56.2%
Edge (no-vig)+6.6 pp
Fair-128
Projection 7.4 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.6%
Leonie FiebichInsufficient data
Janelle Salaun OverLine 12.5 · -132
Model57.8%
Edge (no-vig)+4.7 pp
Fair-137
Projection 15.1 · Break-even 56.9% · No-vig 53.1%
Janelle Salaun UnderLine 12.5 · -101
Model42.2%
Edge (no-vig)-4.7 pp
Fair+137
Projection 15.1 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.9%
Veronica Burton OverLine 13.5 · -113
Model55.5%
Edge (no-vig)+5.9 pp
Fair-125
Projection 14.8 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.6%
Veronica Burton UnderLine 13.5 · -117
Model44.5%
Edge (no-vig)-5.9 pp
Fair+125
Projection 14.8 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.4%
Gabby Williams OverLine 13.5 · -118
Model51.6%
Edge (no-vig)+1.1 pp
Fair-107
Projection 14.3 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.5%
Gabby Williams UnderLine 13.5 · -113
Model48.4%
Edge (no-vig)-1.1 pp
Fair+107
Projection 14.3 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.5%
Jonquel Jones OverLine 14.5 · -113
Model41.9%
Edge (no-vig)-7.7 pp
Fair+139
Projection 11.8 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.6%
Jonquel Jones UnderLine 14.5 · -117
Model58.1%
Edge (no-vig)+7.7 pp
Fair-139
Projection 11.8 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.4%
Sabrina Ionescu OverLine 16.5 · -122
Model39.0%
Edge (no-vig)-12.3 pp
Fair+156
Projection 12.9 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.3%
Sabrina Ionescu UnderLine 16.5 · -109
Model61.0%
Edge (no-vig)+12.3 pp
Fair-156
Projection 12.9 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 48.7%
Breanna Stewart OverLine 20.5 · -121
Model34.4%
Edge (no-vig)-16.7 pp
Fair+191
Projection 14.5 · Break-even 54.8% · No-vig 51.1%
Breanna Stewart UnderLine 20.5 · -110
Model65.6%
Edge (no-vig)+16.7 pp
Fair-191
Projection 14.5 · Break-even 52.4% · No-vig 48.9%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 75.8/100
Cecilia Zandalasini OverLine 2.5 · +133
Model44.9%
Edge (no-vig)+5.0 pp
Fair+123
Projection 2.2 · Break-even 42.9% · No-vig 39.9%
Cecilia Zandalasini UnderLine 2.5 · -182
Model55.1%
Edge (no-vig)-5.0 pp
Fair-123
Projection 2.2 · Break-even 64.5% · No-vig 60.1%
Leonie FiebichInsufficient data
Gabby Williams OverLine 3.5 · +128
Model45.6%
Edge (no-vig)+4.8 pp
Fair+119
Projection 3.3 · Break-even 43.9% · No-vig 40.8%
Gabby Williams UnderLine 3.5 · -175
Model54.4%
Edge (no-vig)-4.8 pp
Fair-119
Projection 3.3 · Break-even 63.6% · No-vig 59.2%
Veronica Burton OverLine 3.5 · -120
Model54.4%
Edge (no-vig)+3.8 pp
Fair-120
Projection 3.7 · Break-even 54.5% · No-vig 50.7%
Veronica Burton UnderLine 3.5 · -113
Model45.6%
Edge (no-vig)-3.8 pp
Fair+120
Projection 3.7 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.3%
Sabrina Ionescu OverLine 3.5 · -160
Model52.8%
Edge (no-vig)-4.5 pp
Fair-112
Projection 4 · Break-even 61.5% · No-vig 57.3%
Sabrina Ionescu UnderLine 3.5 · +118
Model47.2%
Edge (no-vig)+4.5 pp
Fair+112
Projection 4 · Break-even 45.9% · No-vig 42.7%
Kayla Thornton OverLine 4.5 · -103
Model38.5%
Edge (no-vig)-8.7 pp
Fair+160
Projection 2.7 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 47.2%
Kayla Thornton UnderLine 4.5 · -131
Model61.5%
Edge (no-vig)+8.7 pp
Fair-160
Projection 2.7 · Break-even 56.7% · No-vig 52.8%
Kiah Stokes OverLine 5.5 · -125
Model54.1%
Edge (no-vig)+2.5 pp
Fair-118
Projection 6.1 · Break-even 55.6% · No-vig 51.6%
Kiah Stokes UnderLine 5.5 · -109
Model45.9%
Edge (no-vig)-2.5 pp
Fair+118
Projection 6.1 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 48.4%
Breanna Stewart OverLine 7.5 · -134
Model46.1%
Edge (no-vig)-7.2 pp
Fair+117
Projection 6.9 · Break-even 57.3% · No-vig 53.3%
Breanna Stewart UnderLine 7.5 · -101
Model53.9%
Edge (no-vig)+7.2 pp
Fair-117
Projection 6.9 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.7%
Jonquel Jones OverLine 9.5 · +108
Model50.9%
Edge (no-vig)+6.2 pp
Fair-104
Projection 9.5 · Break-even 48.1% · No-vig 44.7%
Jonquel Jones UnderLine 9.5 · -147
Model49.1%
Edge (no-vig)-6.2 pp
Fair+104
Projection 9.5 · Break-even 59.5% · No-vig 55.3%
Washington Mystics at Phoenix Mercury
Washington Mystics 23-15
Phoenix Mercury 13-25
Scheduled · Mortgage Matchup Center
ML-196 / +159
Spread4.5 (-107 / -113)
Total167 (O -103 / U -122)
pinnacle
Washington Mystics
Off Rating#13103.3 ▲ Def Rating#3103.9 ▲ Net Rating#8-0.6 ▲ Pace#1494.3 ▲
Phoenix Mercury
Off Rating#12104.7 ▲ Def Rating#12109.5 ▲ Net Rating#10-4.9 ▼ Pace#1296.0
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v7-final-role-distribution
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Washington Mystics81
–
Phoenix Mercury76.2
Scoring range (P20 / median / P80) 73.7 / 81 / 88.3 68.5 / 76.2 / 83.9 Total range148.2 / 157.2 / 166.2
Washington Mystics68.4%Phoenix Mercury31.6%
Possessions79.3 Model spreadPhoenix Mercury +4.8 Model total157.2 Game-script reliability75.8%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread+4.5+0.3 Total167-9.8 Moneyline38.6%-7.0%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerWashington Mystics 68.4%
SpreadPass
TotalUnder 167 · Bet
Best playTotal: Under 167
Early thresholds · a pass is intentional.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 75.8/100
Phoenix MercuryLine ML · +159
Model23.1%
Edge (no-vig)-13.8 pp
Fair+333
Projection -6.74 · Break-even 38.6% · No-vig 36.8%
Washington MysticsLine ML · -196
Model76.9%
Edge (no-vig)+13.8 pp
Fair-333
Projection 6.74 · Break-even 66.2% · No-vig 63.2%
SPREADReliability 75.8/100
Phoenix MercuryLine 4.5 · -113
Model40.3%
Edge (no-vig)-10.3 pp
Fair+148
Projection -6.74 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 50.6%
Washington MysticsLine -4.5 · -107
Model59.7%
Edge (no-vig)+10.3 pp
Fair-148
Projection 6.74 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 49.4%
TOTALReliability 75.8/100
OverLine 167 · -103
Model28.1%
Edge (no-vig)-19.9 pp
Fair+256
Projection 158.06 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 48.0%
UnderLine 167 · -122
Model71.9%
Edge (no-vig)+19.9 pp
Fair-256
Projection 158.06 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 52.0%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 75.8/100
Lauren Betts OverLine 6.5 · -107
Model39.3%
Edge (no-vig)-9.0 pp
Fair+155
Projection 5 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.3%
Lauren Betts UnderLine 6.5 · -124
Model60.7%
Edge (no-vig)+9.0 pp
Fair-155
Projection 5 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 51.7%
Georgia Amoore OverLine 6.5 · -112
Model47.6%
Edge (no-vig)-1.7 pp
Fair+110
Projection 5.4 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.3%
Georgia Amoore UnderLine 6.5 · -119
Model52.4%
Edge (no-vig)+1.7 pp
Fair-110
Projection 5.4 · Break-even 54.3% · No-vig 50.7%
Noemie Brochant OverLine 7.5 · -108
Model56.1%
Edge (no-vig)+7.6 pp
Fair-128
Projection 9.7 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.5%
Noemie Brochant UnderLine 7.5 · -123
Model43.9%
Edge (no-vig)-7.6 pp
Fair+128
Projection 9.7 · Break-even 55.2% · No-vig 51.5%
Michaela Onyenwere OverLine 8.5 · +103
Model47.7%
Edge (no-vig)+1.7 pp
Fair+109
Projection 7.5 · Break-even 49.3% · No-vig 46.0%
Michaela Onyenwere UnderLine 8.5 · -137
Model52.3%
Edge (no-vig)-1.7 pp
Fair-109
Projection 7.5 · Break-even 57.8% · No-vig 54.0%
Natasha Mack OverLine 9.5 · -109
Model46.2%
Edge (no-vig)-2.6 pp
Fair+116
Projection 8.5 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 48.8%
Natasha Mack UnderLine 9.5 · -121
Model53.8%
Edge (no-vig)+2.6 pp
Fair-116
Projection 8.5 · Break-even 54.8% · No-vig 51.2%
Kelsey PlumInsufficient data
Alyssa Thomas OverLine 14.5 · -107
Model56.4%
Edge (no-vig)+8.2 pp
Fair-130
Projection 15.7 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.3%
Alyssa Thomas UnderLine 14.5 · -124
Model43.6%
Edge (no-vig)-8.2 pp
Fair+130
Projection 15.7 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 51.7%
Kiki Iriafen OverLine 14.5 · -108
Model52.4%
Edge (no-vig)+3.9 pp
Fair-110
Projection 14.8 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.5%
Kiki Iriafen UnderLine 14.5 · -123
Model47.6%
Edge (no-vig)-3.9 pp
Fair+110
Projection 14.8 · Break-even 55.2% · No-vig 51.5%
Sonia Citron OverLine 17.5 · -105
Model33.8%
Edge (no-vig)-14.0 pp
Fair+196
Projection 14.3 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 47.8%
Sonia Citron UnderLine 17.5 · -127
Model66.2%
Edge (no-vig)+14.0 pp
Fair-196
Projection 14.3 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.2%
Shakira Austin OverLine 17.5 · -110
Model51.7%
Edge (no-vig)+2.7 pp
Fair-107
Projection 18.4 · Break-even 52.4% · No-vig 49.0%
Shakira Austin UnderLine 17.5 · -120
Model48.3%
Edge (no-vig)-2.7 pp
Fair+107
Projection 18.4 · Break-even 54.5% · No-vig 51.0%
Kahleah Copper OverLine 19.5 · -110
Model58.4%
Edge (no-vig)+9.4 pp
Fair-141
Projection 23.9 · Break-even 52.4% · No-vig 49.0%
Kahleah Copper UnderLine 19.5 · -120
Model41.6%
Edge (no-vig)-9.4 pp
Fair+141
Projection 23.9 · Break-even 54.5% · No-vig 51.0%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 75.8/100
Michaela Onyenwere OverLine 2.5 · -102
Model43.7%
Edge (no-vig)-3.3 pp
Fair+129
Projection 1.9 · Break-even 50.5% · No-vig 46.9%
Michaela Onyenwere UnderLine 2.5 · -133
Model56.3%
Edge (no-vig)+3.3 pp
Fair-129
Projection 1.9 · Break-even 57.1% · No-vig 53.1%
Kahleah Copper OverLine 3.5 · +117
Model49.1%
Edge (no-vig)+6.3 pp
Fair+104
Projection 3.5 · Break-even 46.1% · No-vig 42.9%
Kahleah Copper UnderLine 3.5 · -159
Model50.9%
Edge (no-vig)-6.3 pp
Fair-104
Projection 3.5 · Break-even 61.4% · No-vig 57.1%
Sonia Citron OverLine 3.5 · -121
Model47.7%
Edge (no-vig)-3.1 pp
Fair+109
Projection 3.4 · Break-even 54.8% · No-vig 50.9%
Sonia Citron UnderLine 3.5 · -112
Model52.3%
Edge (no-vig)+3.1 pp
Fair-109
Projection 3.4 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.1%
Natasha Mack OverLine 8.5 · +105
Model32.6%
Edge (no-vig)-12.7 pp
Fair+207
Projection 5.7 · Break-even 48.8% · No-vig 45.3%
Natasha Mack UnderLine 8.5 · -143
Model67.4%
Edge (no-vig)+12.7 pp
Fair-207
Projection 5.7 · Break-even 58.9% · No-vig 54.7%
Alyssa Thomas OverLine 8.5 · -102
Model56.3%
Edge (no-vig)+9.4 pp
Fair-129
Projection 10.5 · Break-even 50.5% · No-vig 46.9%
Alyssa Thomas UnderLine 8.5 · -133
Model43.7%
Edge (no-vig)-9.4 pp
Fair+129
Projection 10.5 · Break-even 57.1% · No-vig 53.1%
Shakira Austin OverLine 9.5 · -112
Model50.5%
Edge (no-vig)+1.4 pp
Fair-102
Projection 9.3 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.1%
Shakira Austin UnderLine 9.5 · -121
Model49.5%
Edge (no-vig)-1.4 pp
Fair+102
Projection 9.3 · Break-even 54.8% · No-vig 50.9%
Kiki Iriafen OverLine 9.5 · -119
Model51.3%
Edge (no-vig)+0.8 pp
Fair-106
Projection 9.8 · Break-even 54.3% · No-vig 50.5%
Kiki Iriafen UnderLine 9.5 · -114
Model48.7%
Edge (no-vig)-0.8 pp
Fair+106
Projection 9.8 · Break-even 53.3% · No-vig 49.5%

Player PTS & REB Projections

Pregame outputs from projected rotations and stored ESPN box-score history.

player-pr-v1

Golden State Valkyries at New York Liberty

Golden State Valkyries15 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Veronica BurtonACTIVE27.614.83.7
Gabby WilliamsACTIVE24.014.33.3
Janelle SalaunACTIVE22.015.13.5
Kiah StokesACTIVE20.33.86.1
Kayla ThorntonACTIVE20.25.52.7
Cecilia ZandalasiniACTIVE15.57.42.2
Tiffany HayesACTIVE14.910.33.0
Kaila CharlesACTIVE12.64.72.4
Kaitlyn ChenACTIVE11.13.50.7
Ashten PrechtelACTIVE10.91.32.7
Laeticia AmihereACTIVE9.63.02.3
Juste JocyteACTIVE4.41.00.0
Miela SowahACTIVE3.50.01.1
Nadia FingallACTIVE3.41.20.5
Iliana RupertOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line
New York Liberty14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Leonie FiebichACTIVE34.015.84.9
Breanna StewartACTIVE32.514.66.9
Sabrina IonescuACTIVE29.813.04.0
Jonquel JonesACTIVE26.611.99.5
Rebecca AllenACTIVE24.97.73.3
Pauline AstierACTIVE12.03.31.0
Marine JohannesACTIVE11.64.40.7
Han XuACTIVE9.73.92.2
Marine FauthouxACTIVE7.71.51.1
Rebekah GardnerACTIVE7.02.11.5
Raquel CarreraACTIVE4.20.41.0
Anneli MaleyOUT0.00.00.0
Elizabeth BalogunOUT0.00.00.0
Satou SaballyOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line

Washington Mystics at Phoenix Mercury

Washington Mystics14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Sonia CitronACTIVE31.314.33.4
Kiki IriafenACTIVE29.214.89.8
Shakira AustinACTIVE28.918.49.3
Georgia AmooreACTIVE22.85.42.0
Michaela OnyenwereACTIVE22.37.51.9
Lauren BettsACTIVE17.55.05.2
Cotie McMahonACTIVE16.46.12.7
Betnijah Laney-HamiltonACTIVE13.93.61.4
Alicia FlorezACTIVE6.51.71.0
Cassandre ProsperACTIVE3.91.00.5
Angela DugalicACTIVE2.40.90.6
Lucy OlsenACTIVE2.11.30.0
Rori HarmonACTIVE1.40.90.0
Add optional player line
Phoenix Mercury15 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Kahleah CopperACTIVE39.223.93.5
Alyssa ThomasACTIVE37.915.710.5
Noemie BrochantACTIVE29.59.71.5
Sami WhitcombACTIVE23.36.31.9
Natasha MackACTIVE21.98.55.7
Valeriane AyayiACTIVE17.35.12.2
Lexi HeldACTIVE13.74.51.1
Maddy WestbeldACTIVE10.30.01.1
Kara DunnACTIVE2.30.90.2
Saylor PoffenbargerACTIVE2.30.90.2
Shay CiezkiACTIVE2.30.90.2
Jovana NogicOUT0.00.00.0
Kelsey PlumOUT0.00.00.0
Kyara LinskensOUT0.00.00.0
Marta SuarezOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line

Matchup Stats

Season supporting evidence from stored ESPN completed box scores.

Golden State Valkyries at New York Liberty

Golden State Valkyries at New York Liberty

Golden State ValkyriesNew York Liberty
84.0
Points
94.0
73.5
Points allowed
87.7
43.8%
Field goal %
48.0%
—
Opponent FG %
—
34.2
Rebounds
37.2
21.2
Assists
23.3
9.9
Turnovers
12.7
8.4
Steals
5.8
3.4
Blocks
3.7

Golden State Valkyries leaders

PTSJanelle Salaun14.1
REBKiah Stokes6.9
ASTVeronica Burton5.9
STLVeronica Burton2.0
BLKKiah Stokes1.7
3PMJanelle Salaun2.4

New York Liberty leaders

PTSLeonie Fiebich20.0
REBJonquel Jones9.8
ASTSabrina Ionescu6.0
STLBreanna Stewart1.1
BLKBreanna Stewart1.0
3PMLeonie Fiebich3.0
Washington Mystics at Phoenix Mercury

Washington Mystics at Phoenix Mercury

Washington MysticsPhoenix Mercury
87.8
Points
86.6
84.0
Points allowed
92.1
48.3%
Field goal %
45.6%
—
Opponent FG %
—
39.1
Rebounds
31.3
20.3
Assists
21.6
13.2
Turnovers
13.0
6.0
Steals
6.9
4.3
Blocks
3.0

Washington Mystics leaders

PTSShakira Austin20.8
REBKiki Iriafen9.6
ASTSonia Citron5.6
STLSonia Citron1.0
BLKShakira Austin1.5
3PMSonia Citron1.9

Phoenix Mercury leaders

PTSKahleah Copper21.7
REBAlyssa Thomas9.3
ASTAlyssa Thomas8.3
STLAlyssa Thomas1.6
BLKDeWanna Bonner1.0
3PMKahleah Copper1.8

2026 League-wide Stored Stat Leaders

These rankings cover the stored league sample and do not change when viewing a different matchup.

Points

1. Kelsey Mitchell28.4

2. A'ja Wilson24.8

3. Caitlin Clark23.4

4. Jackie Young22.5

5. Kahleah Copper21.7

Rebounds

1. Angel Reese14.5

2. Kamilla Cardoso10.3

3. Jonquel Jones9.8

4. Kiki Iriafen9.6

5. Shakira Austin9.6

Assists

1. Caitlin Clark9.1

2. Alyssa Thomas8.3

3. Olivia Miles7.2

4. Carla Leite7.0

5. Jackie Young6.2

Steals

1. Azzi Fudd2.5

2. Angel Reese2.0

3. Kennedy Burke2.0

4. Rhyne Howard2.0

5. Veronica Burton2.0

Blocks

1. Awak Kuier2.4

2. A'ja Wilson2.1

3. Cameron Brink2.1

4. Brittney Griner2.0

5. Dominique Malonga1.9

3-pointers made

1. Kayla McBride3.7

2. Rhyne Howard3.7

3. Marina Mabrey3.6

4. Kelsey Mitchell3.5

5. Caitlin Clark3.4