Triple Threat WNBA Mobile Snapshot

2026-08-24 · Captured 2026-08-24 19:31 UTC
Frozen pregame snapshot. 2 games loaded Lines and projections do not update on this page.
Golden State Valkyries at Minnesota Lynx
Golden State Valkyries 25-11
Minnesota Lynx 31-7
Scheduled · Target Center
ML+174 / -206
Spread-4.5 (-103 / -113)
Total161 (O -113 / U -107)
pinnacle
Golden State Valkyries
Off Rating#7109.9 ▼ Def Rating#1101.1 ▼ Net Rating#28.8 ▲ Pace#1591.1
Minnesota Lynx
Off Rating#2113.9 ▲ Def Rating#3103.4 ▲ Net Rating#110.5 ▼ Pace#797.4 ▼
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v7-final-role-distribution
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Golden State Valkyries82.8
–
Minnesota Lynx74.7
Scoring range (P20 / median / P80) 74.3 / 82.8 / 91.3 68.8 / 74.7 / 80.6 Total range148.7 / 157.5 / 166.3
Golden State Valkyries79.4%Minnesota Lynx20.6%
Possessions78.5 Model spreadMinnesota Lynx +8.1 Model total157.5 Game-script reliability76.2%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread-4.5+12.6 Total161-3.5 Moneyline67.3%-46.8%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerGolden State Valkyries 79.4%
SpreadGolden State Valkyries +4.5 · Bet
TotalUnder 161 · Lean
Best playMoneyline: Golden State Valkyries
Early thresholds · a pass is intentional.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 76.2/100
Minnesota LynxLine ML · -206
Model15.9%
Edge (no-vig)-48.9 pp
Fair+529
Projection -9.6 · Break-even 67.3% · No-vig 64.8%
Golden State ValkyriesLine ML · +174
Model84.1%
Edge (no-vig)+48.9 pp
Fair-529
Projection 9.6 · Break-even 36.5% · No-vig 35.1%
SPREADReliability 76.2/100
Minnesota LynxLine -4.5 · -113
Model7.1%
Edge (no-vig)-44.0 pp
Fair+1303
Projection -9.6 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 51.1%
Golden State ValkyriesLine 4.5 · -103
Model92.9%
Edge (no-vig)+44.0 pp
Fair-1303
Projection 9.6 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 48.9%
TOTALReliability 76.2/100
OverLine 161 · -113
Model48.0%
Edge (no-vig)-2.6 pp
Fair+108
Projection 160.2 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 50.6%
UnderLine 161 · -107
Model52.0%
Edge (no-vig)+2.6 pp
Fair-108
Projection 160.2 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 49.4%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 76.2/100
Kayla Thornton OverLine 7.5 · -107
Model44.9%
Edge (no-vig)-3.4 pp
Fair+123
Projection 7.2 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.3%
Kayla Thornton UnderLine 7.5 · -124
Model55.1%
Edge (no-vig)+3.4 pp
Fair-123
Projection 7.2 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 51.7%
Cecilia Zandalasini OverLine 8.5 · -120
Model47.3%
Edge (no-vig)-3.6 pp
Fair+111
Projection 8.7 · Break-even 54.5% · No-vig 50.9%
Cecilia Zandalasini UnderLine 8.5 · -111
Model52.7%
Edge (no-vig)+3.6 pp
Fair-111
Projection 8.7 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 49.1%
Tiffany Hayes OverLine 9.5 · -132
Model86.6%
Edge (no-vig)+33.5 pp
Fair-645
Projection 13.7 · Break-even 56.9% · No-vig 53.1%
Tiffany Hayes UnderLine 9.5 · -101
Model13.4%
Edge (no-vig)-33.5 pp
Fair+645
Projection 13.7 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.9%
Natasha Howard OverLine 11.5 · -127
Model57.3%
Edge (no-vig)+5.1 pp
Fair-134
Projection 12.1 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.2%
Natasha Howard UnderLine 11.5 · -105
Model42.7%
Edge (no-vig)-5.1 pp
Fair+134
Projection 12.1 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 47.8%
Janelle Salaun OverLine 11.5 · -127
Model36.8%
Edge (no-vig)-15.5 pp
Fair+172
Projection 9.8 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.3%
Janelle Salaun UnderLine 11.5 · -104
Model63.2%
Edge (no-vig)+15.5 pp
Fair-172
Projection 9.8 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.7%
Veronica Burton OverLine 12.5 · -118
Model57.3%
Edge (no-vig)+6.7 pp
Fair-134
Projection 13.5 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.6%
Veronica Burton UnderLine 12.5 · -112
Model42.7%
Edge (no-vig)-6.7 pp
Fair+134
Projection 13.5 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.4%
Gabby Williams OverLine 13.5 · -122
Model44.9%
Edge (no-vig)-6.5 pp
Fair+123
Projection 13.2 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.4%
Gabby Williams UnderLine 13.5 · -108
Model55.1%
Edge (no-vig)+6.5 pp
Fair-123
Projection 13.2 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.6%
Kayla McBride OverLine 16.5 · -104
Model48.4%
Edge (no-vig)+0.7 pp
Fair+107
Projection 17.5 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.7%
Kayla McBride UnderLine 16.5 · -127
Model51.6%
Edge (no-vig)-0.7 pp
Fair-107
Projection 17.5 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.3%
Napheesa Collier OverLine 18.5 · -129
Model31.1%
Edge (no-vig)-21.5 pp
Fair+221
Projection 16.9 · Break-even 56.3% · No-vig 52.6%
Napheesa Collier UnderLine 18.5 · -103
Model68.8%
Edge (no-vig)+21.5 pp
Fair-221
Projection 16.9 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 47.4%
Olivia Miles OverLine 19.5 · +107
Model50.4%
Edge (no-vig)+3.8 pp
Fair-101
Projection 18.8 · Break-even 48.3% · No-vig 46.6%
Olivia Miles UnderLine 19.5 · -124
Model49.6%
Edge (no-vig)-3.8 pp
Fair+101
Projection 18.8 · Break-even 55.4% · No-vig 53.4%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 76.2/100
Cecilia Zandalasini OverLine 2.5 · +136
Model61.8%
Edge (no-vig)+22.4 pp
Fair-162
Projection 3.6 · Break-even 42.4% · No-vig 39.4%
Cecilia Zandalasini UnderLine 2.5 · -187
Model38.2%
Edge (no-vig)-22.4 pp
Fair+162
Projection 3.6 · Break-even 65.2% · No-vig 60.6%
Kayla McBride OverLine 2.5 · +114
Model35.2%
Edge (no-vig)-8.2 pp
Fair+184
Projection 1.8 · Break-even 46.7% · No-vig 43.5%
Kayla McBride UnderLine 2.5 · -155
Model64.8%
Edge (no-vig)+8.2 pp
Fair-184
Projection 1.8 · Break-even 60.8% · No-vig 56.5%
Tiffany Hayes OverLine 2.5 · -104
Model82.3%
Edge (no-vig)+34.9 pp
Fair-463
Projection 4.6 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.3%
Tiffany Hayes UnderLine 2.5 · -131
Model17.8%
Edge (no-vig)-34.9 pp
Fair+463
Projection 4.6 · Break-even 56.7% · No-vig 52.7%
Gabby Williams OverLine 3.5 · +119
Model38.2%
Edge (no-vig)-4.2 pp
Fair+162
Projection 3.1 · Break-even 45.7% · No-vig 42.5%
Gabby Williams UnderLine 3.5 · -162
Model61.8%
Edge (no-vig)+4.2 pp
Fair-162
Projection 3.1 · Break-even 61.8% · No-vig 57.5%
Veronica Burton OverLine 3.5 · -109
Model61.0%
Edge (no-vig)+12.6 pp
Fair-156
Projection 3.8 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 48.4%
Veronica Burton UnderLine 3.5 · -125
Model39.0%
Edge (no-vig)-12.6 pp
Fair+156
Projection 3.8 · Break-even 55.6% · No-vig 51.6%
Janelle Salaun OverLine 3.5 · -151
Model22.8%
Edge (no-vig)-33.1 pp
Fair+339
Projection 2.4 · Break-even 60.2% · No-vig 55.9%
Janelle Salaun UnderLine 3.5 · +111
Model77.2%
Edge (no-vig)+33.1 pp
Fair-339
Projection 2.4 · Break-even 47.4% · No-vig 44.1%
Olivia Miles OverLine 4.5 · -101
Model42.4%
Edge (no-vig)-4.3 pp
Fair+136
Projection 4.2 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.7%
Olivia Miles UnderLine 4.5 · -135
Model57.6%
Edge (no-vig)+4.3 pp
Fair-136
Projection 4.2 · Break-even 57.5% · No-vig 53.3%
Kayla Thornton OverLine 4.5 · -113
Model32.6%
Edge (no-vig)-16.8 pp
Fair+207
Projection 3.1 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.3%
Kayla Thornton UnderLine 4.5 · -120
Model67.4%
Edge (no-vig)+16.8 pp
Fair-207
Projection 3.1 · Break-even 54.5% · No-vig 50.7%
Natasha Howard OverLine 7.5 · +107
Model53.2%
Edge (no-vig)+8.3 pp
Fair-114
Projection 7.9 · Break-even 48.3% · No-vig 44.9%
Natasha Howard UnderLine 7.5 · -146
Model46.8%
Edge (no-vig)-8.3 pp
Fair+114
Projection 7.9 · Break-even 59.4% · No-vig 55.1%
Napheesa Collier OverLine 8.5 · +102
Model29.6%
Edge (no-vig)-16.5 pp
Fair+238
Projection 7.9 · Break-even 49.5% · No-vig 46.1%
Napheesa Collier UnderLine 8.5 · -138
Model70.4%
Edge (no-vig)+16.5 pp
Fair-238
Projection 7.9 · Break-even 58.0% · No-vig 53.9%
Atlanta Dream at Los Angeles Sparks
Atlanta Dream 24-13
Los Angeles Sparks 13-24
Scheduled · crypto.com Arena
ML-526 / +410
Spread10.5 (-109 / -107)
Total181.5 (O -116 / U -104)
pinnacle
Atlanta Dream
Off Rating#5110.5 ▼ Def Rating#4104.8 ▼ Net Rating#45.7 Pace#497.7 ▲
Los Angeles Sparks
Off Rating#10106.5 ▼ Def Rating#14112.1 ▼ Net Rating#12-5.6 ▼ Pace#398.9
MODEL PROJECTION matchup-v7-final-role-distribution
PLAYER DATA LOADED
Atlanta Dream88.4
–
Los Angeles Sparks84.9
Scoring range (P20 / median / P80) 73.3 / 88.4 / 103.5 75.3 / 84.9 / 94.5 Total range158.4 / 173.3 / 188.2
Atlanta Dream59.3%Los Angeles Sparks40.7%
Possessions81.9 Model spreadLos Angeles Sparks +3.5 Model total173.3 Game-script reliability68.4%
MARKET COMPARISON
MarketDifference Spread+10.5-7.0 Total181.5-8.2 Moneyline19.6%+21.1%
MODEL DECISION
Predicted winnerAtlanta Dream 59.3%
SpreadWait · unresolved core role
TotalWait · unresolved core role
Best playPass
Final availability required · spread and total are protected from fragile role assumptions.
LINE-SPECIFIC PROBABILITIES selection-prob-v2
MONEYLINEReliability 68.4/100
Los Angeles SparksLine ML · +410
Model36.0%
Edge (no-vig)+17.1 pp
Fair+178
Projection -5 · Break-even 19.6% · No-vig 18.9%
Atlanta DreamLine ML · -526
Model64.0%
Edge (no-vig)-17.1 pp
Fair-178
Projection 5 · Break-even 84.0% · No-vig 81.1%
SPREADReliability 68.4/100
Los Angeles SparksLine 10.5 · -107
Model65.3%
Edge (no-vig)+15.5 pp
Fair-188
Projection -5 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 49.8%
Atlanta DreamLine -10.5 · -109
Model34.7%
Edge (no-vig)-15.5 pp
Fair+188
Projection 5 · Break-even 52.1% · No-vig 50.2%
TOTALReliability 68.4/100
OverLine 181.5 · -116
Model40.8%
Edge (no-vig)-10.5 pp
Fair+145
Projection 176 · Break-even 53.7% · No-vig 51.3%
UnderLine 181.5 · -104
Model59.2%
Edge (no-vig)+10.5 pp
Fair-145
Projection 176 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 48.7%
PLAYER POINTSReliability 68.4/100
Madina Okot OverLine 7.5 · -104
Model17.7%
Edge (no-vig)-29.9 pp
Fair+464
Projection 3.7 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.6%
Madina Okot UnderLine 7.5 · -128
Model82.3%
Edge (no-vig)+29.9 pp
Fair-464
Projection 3.7 · Break-even 56.1% · No-vig 52.4%
Ariel Atkins OverLine 7.5 · -106
Model45.6%
Edge (no-vig)-2.5 pp
Fair+119
Projection 6.9 · Break-even 51.5% · No-vig 48.1%
Ariel Atkins UnderLine 7.5 · -125
Model54.4%
Edge (no-vig)+2.5 pp
Fair-119
Projection 6.9 · Break-even 55.6% · No-vig 51.9%
Erica Wheeler OverLine 8.5 · -118
Model63.8%
Edge (no-vig)+13.2 pp
Fair-176
Projection 10.3 · Break-even 54.1% · No-vig 50.6%
Erica Wheeler UnderLine 8.5 · -112
Model36.2%
Edge (no-vig)-13.2 pp
Fair+176
Projection 10.3 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.4%
Naz Hillmon OverLine 9.5 · +102
Model33.1%
Edge (no-vig)-13.2 pp
Fair+203
Projection 8 · Break-even 49.5% · No-vig 46.2%
Naz Hillmon UnderLine 9.5 · -136
Model66.9%
Edge (no-vig)+13.2 pp
Fair-203
Projection 8 · Break-even 57.6% · No-vig 53.8%
Cameron Brink OverLine 9.5 · -123
Model34.5%
Edge (no-vig)-17.1 pp
Fair+190
Projection 8 · Break-even 55.2% · No-vig 51.6%
Cameron Brink UnderLine 9.5 · -107
Model65.5%
Edge (no-vig)+17.1 pp
Fair-190
Projection 8 · Break-even 51.7% · No-vig 48.4%
Jordin Canada OverLine 11.5 · -132
Model44.0%
Edge (no-vig)-9.1 pp
Fair+127
Projection 11.1 · Break-even 56.9% · No-vig 53.1%
Jordin Canada UnderLine 11.5 · -101
Model56.0%
Edge (no-vig)+9.1 pp
Fair-127
Projection 11.1 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.9%
Dearica Hamby OverLine 13.5 · -117
Model62.1%
Edge (no-vig)+11.7 pp
Fair-164
Projection 15.4 · Break-even 53.9% · No-vig 50.4%
Dearica Hamby UnderLine 13.5 · -113
Model37.9%
Edge (no-vig)-11.7 pp
Fair+164
Projection 15.4 · Break-even 53.0% · No-vig 49.6%
Rae Burrell OverLine 14.5 · -127
Model17.7%
Edge (no-vig)-34.6 pp
Fair+465
Projection 9.5 · Break-even 56.0% · No-vig 52.3%
Rae Burrell UnderLine 14.5 · -104
Model82.3%
Edge (no-vig)+34.6 pp
Fair-465
Projection 9.5 · Break-even 51.0% · No-vig 47.7%
Nneka Ogwumike OverLine 15.5 · -102
Model52.8%
Edge (no-vig)+5.6 pp
Fair-112
Projection 15.4 · Break-even 50.5% · No-vig 47.2%
Nneka Ogwumike UnderLine 15.5 · -130
Model47.3%
Edge (no-vig)-5.6 pp
Fair+112
Projection 15.4 · Break-even 56.5% · No-vig 52.8%
Angel Reese OverLine 17.5 · -116
Model49.0%
Edge (no-vig)-1.2 pp
Fair+104
Projection 16.6 · Break-even 53.7% · No-vig 50.2%
Angel Reese UnderLine 17.5 · -114
Model51.0%
Edge (no-vig)+1.2 pp
Fair-104
Projection 16.6 · Break-even 53.3% · No-vig 49.8%
Rhyne Howard OverLine 18.5 · -115
Model62.8%
Edge (no-vig)+12.9 pp
Fair-169
Projection 20.3 · Break-even 53.5% · No-vig 49.9%
Rhyne Howard UnderLine 18.5 · -116
Model37.2%
Edge (no-vig)-12.9 pp
Fair+169
Projection 20.3 · Break-even 53.7% · No-vig 50.1%
Allisha Gray OverLine 19.5 · -119
Model45.5%
Edge (no-vig)-5.2 pp
Fair+120
Projection 18.6 · Break-even 54.3% · No-vig 50.7%
Allisha Gray UnderLine 19.5 · -112
Model54.5%
Edge (no-vig)+5.2 pp
Fair-120
Projection 18.6 · Break-even 52.8% · No-vig 49.3%
PLAYER REBOUNDSReliability 68.4/100
Ariel Atkins OverLine 2.5 · +136
Model54.8%
Edge (no-vig)+15.4 pp
Fair-121
Projection 2.9 · Break-even 42.4% · No-vig 39.4%
Ariel Atkins UnderLine 2.5 · -187
Model45.2%
Edge (no-vig)-15.4 pp
Fair+121
Projection 2.9 · Break-even 65.2% · No-vig 60.6%
Rhyne Howard OverLine 3.5 · -103
Model45.6%
Edge (no-vig)-1.5 pp
Fair+119
Projection 3.3 · Break-even 50.7% · No-vig 47.1%
Rhyne Howard UnderLine 3.5 · -132
Model54.4%
Edge (no-vig)+1.5 pp
Fair-119
Projection 3.3 · Break-even 56.9% · No-vig 52.9%
Allisha Gray OverLine 3.5 · -105
Model54.6%
Edge (no-vig)+7.1 pp
Fair-120
Projection 4.1 · Break-even 51.2% · No-vig 47.5%
Allisha Gray UnderLine 3.5 · -130
Model45.4%
Edge (no-vig)-7.1 pp
Fair+120
Projection 4.1 · Break-even 56.5% · No-vig 52.5%
Jordin Canada OverLine 3.5 · -111
Model55.3%
Edge (no-vig)+6.3 pp
Fair-123
Projection 3.9 · Break-even 52.6% · No-vig 48.9%
Jordin Canada UnderLine 3.5 · -122
Model44.8%
Edge (no-vig)-6.3 pp
Fair+123
Projection 3.9 · Break-even 54.9% · No-vig 51.1%
Madina Okot OverLine 4.5 · +111
Model33.8%
Edge (no-vig)-10.2 pp
Fair+196
Projection 3.1 · Break-even 47.4% · No-vig 44.0%
Madina Okot UnderLine 4.5 · -152
Model66.2%
Edge (no-vig)+10.2 pp
Fair-196
Projection 3.1 · Break-even 60.3% · No-vig 56.0%
Naz Hillmon OverLine 4.5 · -134
Model58.9%
Edge (no-vig)+5.6 pp
Fair-143
Projection 5 · Break-even 57.3% · No-vig 53.3%
Naz Hillmon UnderLine 4.5 · -101
Model41.1%
Edge (no-vig)-5.6 pp
Fair+143
Projection 5 · Break-even 50.2% · No-vig 46.7%
Dearica Hamby OverLine 5.5 · -142
Model52.2%
Edge (no-vig)-2.4 pp
Fair-109
Projection 6.3 · Break-even 58.7% · No-vig 54.6%
Dearica Hamby UnderLine 5.5 · +105
Model47.8%
Edge (no-vig)+2.4 pp
Fair+109
Projection 6.3 · Break-even 48.8% · No-vig 45.4%
Cameron Brink OverLine 6.5 · +114
Model18.8%
Edge (no-vig)-24.6 pp
Fair+431
Projection 4.5 · Break-even 46.7% · No-vig 43.5%
Cameron Brink UnderLine 6.5 · -155
Model81.2%
Edge (no-vig)+24.6 pp
Fair-431
Projection 4.5 · Break-even 60.8% · No-vig 56.5%
Nneka Ogwumike OverLine 7.5 · +108
Model56.6%
Edge (no-vig)+11.8 pp
Fair-130
Projection 8.3 · Break-even 48.1% · No-vig 44.8%
Nneka Ogwumike UnderLine 7.5 · -146
Model43.4%
Edge (no-vig)-11.8 pp
Fair+130
Projection 8.3 · Break-even 59.4% · No-vig 55.3%
Angel Reese OverLine 12.5 · -126
Model66.4%
Edge (no-vig)+14.6 pp
Fair-197
Projection 13.7 · Break-even 55.8% · No-vig 51.8%
Angel Reese UnderLine 12.5 · -108
Model33.6%
Edge (no-vig)-14.6 pp
Fair+197
Projection 13.7 · Break-even 51.9% · No-vig 48.2%

Player PTS & REB Projections

Pregame outputs from projected rotations and stored ESPN box-score history.

player-pr-v1

Golden State Valkyries at Minnesota Lynx

Golden State Valkyries15 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Veronica BurtonACTIVE28.413.53.8
Gabby WilliamsACTIVE23.413.23.1
Kayla ThorntonACTIVE23.47.23.1
Tiffany HayesACTIVE21.813.74.6
Cecilia ZandalasiniACTIVE21.58.73.6
Kiah StokesACTIVE15.72.74.4
Janelle SalaunACTIVE15.39.82.4
Kaila CharlesACTIVE13.34.22.2
Ashten PrechtelACTIVE13.22.22.2
Kaitlyn ChenACTIVE10.62.70.7
Laeticia AmihereACTIVE8.92.72.1
Juste JocyteACTIVE1.51.50.0
Miela SowahACTIVE1.50.60.2
Nadia FingallACTIVE1.50.00.0
Iliana RupertOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line
Minnesota Lynx14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Kayla McBrideACTIVE35.517.51.8
Napheesa CollierACTIVE34.916.97.9
Olivia MilesACTIVE34.418.84.2
Natasha HowardACTIVE32.212.17.9
Nia CoffeyACTIVE20.04.13.2
Maya CaldwellACTIVE11.61.81.9
Dorka JuhaszACTIVE11.11.71.7
Antonia DelaereACTIVE6.10.30.3
Chloe BibbyACTIVE5.30.01.0
Eliska JoklovaACTIVE2.60.50.8
Anastasiia Olairi KosuACTIVE2.10.00.0
Elena BuenavidaACTIVE2.10.60.3
Liatu KingACTIVE2.10.40.3
Courtney WilliamsOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line

Atlanta Dream at Los Angeles Sparks

Atlanta Dream14 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Rhyne HowardACTIVE34.620.33.3
Angel ReeseACTIVE33.416.613.7
Allisha GrayACTIVE32.718.64.1
Jordin CanadaACTIVE30.011.13.9
Naz HillmonACTIVE29.48.05.0
Isobel BorlaseACTIVE11.72.81.2
Madina OkotACTIVE8.93.73.1
Jaylyn SherrodACTIVE5.41.30.7
Te-Hina PaopaoACTIVE4.82.30.2
Aaliyah NyeACTIVE3.01.20.4
Sika KoneACTIVE2.10.70.4
Indya NivarACTIVE1.50.50.2
Brionna JonesOUT0.00.00.0
Add optional player line
Los Angeles Sparks13 roster players
PlayerMinPTSREB
Nneka OgwumikeACTIVE29.915.48.3
Dearica HambyACTIVE27.415.46.3
Ariel AtkinsACTIVE25.56.92.9
Erica WheelerACTIVE25.110.32.1
Rae BurrellQUESTIONABLE15.49.51.2
Cameron BrinkACTIVE15.28.04.5
Monique Akoa MakaniACTIVE12.13.11.1
Tonie MorganACTIVE11.84.70.8
Chance GrayACTIVE9.93.31.1
Alissa PiliACTIVE8.32.62.0
Jihyun ParkACTIVE7.42.10.6
Kate MartinACTIVE6.31.32.0
Emma CannonACTIVE5.72.31.9
Add optional player line

Matchup Stats

Season supporting evidence from stored ESPN completed box scores.

Golden State Valkyries at Minnesota Lynx

Golden State Valkyries at Minnesota Lynx

Golden State ValkyriesMinnesota Lynx
83.9
Points
92.4
75.6
Points allowed
85.5
42.7%
Field goal %
50.4%
—
Opponent FG %
—
33.6
Rebounds
31.1
20.6
Assists
22.4
10.1
Turnovers
11.1
8.4
Steals
8.1
2.5
Blocks
3.5

Golden State Valkyries leaders

PTSJanelle Salaun14.3
REBKiah Stokes6.7
ASTVeronica Burton5.4
STLVeronica Burton1.9
BLKKiah Stokes1.4
3PMJanelle Salaun2.3

Minnesota Lynx leaders

PTSOlivia Miles22.1
REBNapheesa Collier7.6
ASTOlivia Miles7.5
STLKayla McBride1.5
BLKNapheesa Collier1.1
3PMKayla McBride3.9
Atlanta Dream at Los Angeles Sparks

Atlanta Dream at Los Angeles Sparks

Atlanta DreamLos Angeles Sparks
97.7
Points
84.1
87.6
Points allowed
89.8
45.5%
Field goal %
46.8%
—
Opponent FG %
—
37.1
Rebounds
31.9
23.3
Assists
22.8
12.0
Turnovers
15.6
7.6
Steals
7.7
4.6
Blocks
3.3

Atlanta Dream leaders

PTSRhyne Howard22.0
REBAngel Reese13.2
ASTJordin Canada6.5
STLRhyne Howard2.1
BLKRhyne Howard1.1
3PMRhyne Howard3.9

Los Angeles Sparks leaders

PTSRae Burrell16.9
REBNneka Ogwumike8.2
ASTErica Wheeler4.9
STLAriel Atkins1.8
BLKCameron Brink1.8
3PMRae Burrell2.0

2026 League-wide Stored Stat Leaders

These rankings cover the stored league sample and do not change when viewing a different matchup.

Points

1. Kelsey Mitchell28.4

2. A'ja Wilson24.8

3. Caitlin Clark23.4

4. Jackie Young22.5

5. Olivia Miles22.1

Rebounds

1. Angel Reese13.2

2. Kamilla Cardoso10.0

3. Shakira Austin10.0

4. Alyssa Thomas9.8

5. Jonquel Jones9.8

Assists

1. Caitlin Clark9.1

2. Alyssa Thomas8.1

3. Olivia Miles7.5

4. Carla Leite7.0

5. Jordin Canada6.5

Steals

1. Azzi Fudd2.5

2. Rhyne Howard2.1

3. Flau'jae Johnson2.0

4. Angel Reese1.9

5. Kennedy Burke1.9

Blocks

1. A'ja Wilson2.1

2. Awak Kuier2.1

3. Brittney Griner2.0

4. Dominique Malonga2.0

5. Cameron Brink1.8

3-pointers made

1. Kayla McBride3.9

2. Rhyne Howard3.9

3. Marina Mabrey3.6

4. Kelsey Mitchell3.5

5. Caitlin Clark3.4